On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > o The whole vnode layer
>
> Two answers here - economics and code stability. This is a filesystem
> which has been worked on by people being payed to do so by a corporation,
> therefore there is a budget (long since blown). It was simpler and hence
> cheaper to wrap XFS in a conversion layer than to rework the code down
> into the bowels of the filesystem. Then the stability part of it, we
> started with a working filesystem, from an engineering standpoint it
> made more sense to keep as much of the existing code base intact as
> possible - the less surgery performed the better in terms of keeping
> things running, and making it easy to take enhancements and fixes made
> in the Irix base into the Linux code (we don't do it the other way around).
I completly understand SGI's reson to do this - but yet I don't want to
see such code in the mainline for obvios reasons..
> > o the hooks for a propritary clusterfs..
>
> Well we have to make money on something you know.... and in reality
> there are not a lot of them in the filesystem.
Again I understand SGI's reasoning - but such hooks are usually not
considered to be a good thing line.
Christoph
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:42 EST