Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 11:36:17 EST

Next message: Jan Harkes: "Re: Implementing a new network based file system"
Previous message: David Chow: "Re: Wrapfs a stackable file system"
In reply to: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Thomas Sailer: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Only "soundcards", that cheap crap like SoundBlaster. Professional
> lowlatency soundcards usually have something like 128-512 samples per
> channel for 24-bit (32-bit data) 96 kHz 8 channels...

Then the problem space isnt interesting. Many graphics cards will hog the
PCI bus for longer than that
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jan Harkes: "Re: Implementing a new network based file system"
Previous message: David Chow: "Re: Wrapfs a stackable file system"
In reply to: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Thomas Sailer: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:44 EST