Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules

From: André Dahlqvist (andre.dahlqvist@telia.com)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 08:33:44 EST

Next message: Francois Romieu: "Re: spurious interrupt with ac kernel but not with vanilla"
Previous message: Till Immanuel Patzschke: "[PATCH] 2.4.10-pre13: ATM drivers cause panic"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> IMHO the default should be complain and taint, even though it will
> generate lots of newbie questions to l-k.

Wasn't it those questions that this feature was meant to prevent in the
first place?

André Dahlqvist <andre.dahlqvist@telia.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Francois Romieu: "Re: spurious interrupt with ac kernel but not with vanilla"
Previous message: Till Immanuel Patzschke: "[PATCH] 2.4.10-pre13: ATM drivers cause panic"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:48 EST