Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 22:21:46 EST

Next message: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Previous message: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
In reply to: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2001-09-22 at 23:18, george anzinger wrote:
> The one thing the latancytimes patch doesn't monitor is interrupt off
> time. Maybe it should...

Yes, it should. And it could... I will add this.

-- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Previous message: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
In reply to: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:52 EST