Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac16

From: Tim Connors (tcon@Physics.usyd.edu.au)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 12:15:28 EST

Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Bug Report. Compiling probs w/ kernel 2.4.9"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac16"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Stefan Becker wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > * Update the VM to Rik's latest bits
> >
> > "swapoff -a" gives:
> >
> > Sep 28 17:25:25 unknown kernel: Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm
> > area (e105a000)
>
> It seems Al Viro forgot to remove a free() when cleaning
> up some code. Hugh Dickens has already posted a patch to
> fix this.

Hmmm. Just searched for it and can't find. Did find references to that
syslog entry being a potentially bad bug though. I presume it is
benign in this situation?

-- TimC -- http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~tcon/

"Eddies in the space time continuum" "Oh. Is he?"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Bug Report. Compiling probs w/ kernel 2.4.9"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac16"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:03 EST