Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

From: Martin J. Bligh (Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 13:37:08 EST


> I suspect the panic has nothing to do with adding the printk, but merely
> that the timing patterns of your disgusting hack have changed
>
> Happy logical analysers 8)

But this printk breaks a standard SMP machine without my patches (well,
just this tiny printk part), not just the NUMA boxes ....

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST