Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 17:43:48 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Previous message: Jeremy Elson: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Next in thread: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Reply: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Can you describe, or point to a description of your tests?

Cerberus is the main one I run. It provides suprisingly effective testing
for load triggered bugs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Previous message: Jeremy Elson: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Next in thread: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Reply: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST