Re: packaging

From: John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:47:57 EST

Next message: vda: "Re: kernel size"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.10] README and Documentation/Changes inconsistent"
In reply to: Dennis.Heuer@stud.uni-hannover.de: "packaging"
Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "Re: packaging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 03:32:20PM +0200, Dennis.Heuer@stud.uni-hannover.de wrote:

> I'm shure you discussed this several times but...
>
> a 30MB download makes me think of splitting the package. There could be one
> package with all experimental modules and one with very old and mainly unused
> modules (like for old CD-ROMS). Don't you think?

please read the FAQ (shown in EVERY lkml message) before posting. Traffic is high
enough as it is.

john

-- 
"For every finger you point at the other guy, check who your other fingers
point at."
	- jd, technocrat.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: vda: "Re: kernel size"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.10] README and Documentation/Changes inconsistent"
In reply to: Dennis.Heuer@stud.uni-hannover.de: "packaging"
Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "Re: packaging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:32 EST