On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 06:10:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <20011011003609.B18573@l-t.ee>
> By author: Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Um. 'noexec' does not touch flags, it only disallows exec'ing
> > on particular mountpoint.
> >
>
> It does on FAT filesystems (except UMSDOS), since they don't have real
> flags. Files and directories have syntesized attributes of
> (0777 & ~umask); noexec is supposed to modify that to (0666 & ~umask)
> for files but not directories.
>
> That has been the Linux behaviour since the 0.x days.
Eh. Seems my brain has managed to filter that out thus far.
Probably as "uninteresting" is the only thing I can say :)
What is interesting is that in current vfat I can toggle
+x bit on and off with chmod. So it seems like VFS does
not consult with fs anymore about bits. But you know
that already.
Oh well...
-- marko- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:36 EST