Re: qsbench on old kernels

From: Stepan Kalichkin (step@ac-sw.com)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 01:56:34 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Previous message: intspecialistsremoval@yahoo.com: "****11,295,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES PLUS $2,000 IN FREE SOFTWARE!"
In reply to: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "qsbench on old kernels"
Next in thread: Stepan Kalichkin: "Re: qsbench on old kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi
I compiled qsbench under windows 2000
And get some interesting results:

Under my linux kernel 2.4.9-ac18

localhost:~/test/qs_bench > time ./qsbench -n 90000000 -p 1 -s 14538
seed = 14538

real 1m50.442s
user 1m48.410s
sys 0m1.660s

And under windows with same parameters:
seed = 14538
time = 48s

-- seed = 14538 time = 47s

-- seed = 14538 time = 48s

May be this comparison is't correctly but so large difference! Any comments? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Previous message: intspecialistsremoval@yahoo.com: "****11,295,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES PLUS $2,000 IN FREE SOFTWARE!"
In reply to: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "qsbench on old kernels"
Next in thread: Stepan Kalichkin: "Re: qsbench on old kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:48 EST