In article <3BC8DAF0.3D16A546@welho.com> Mika.Liljeberg@welho.com wrote:
>I've already disabled quickacks, replaced the receive MSS estimate with
>advertised MSS in the ack sending policy (two places), and removed one
>dubious "immediate ack" condition from send_delay_ack(). The annoying
>thing is that none of this seem to make any real difference. I must be
>missing something huge that's right in front of my nose, but I'm
>starting to run out of steam.
>
>Any thoughts on this?
The discussion has been most complete, I guess at this point is you
can't fix the sender to stop this anti-social behaviour, you might try
using iptables to "mangle" the PSH off from this host or rate limit the
ACKs, or some other hack. None of which is a "solution," just some
interesting things to try.
As noted, the core problem is that TCP doesn't like really asymmetric
bandwidth.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "If I were a diplomat, in the best case I'd go hungry. In the worst case, people would die." -- Robert Lipe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:58 EST