>I keep hearing this type of reasoning. It flat-out doesn't work this way in
>the legal system. This is similar to arguing that you didn't really stab
>someone if you threw the knife instead of holding it. ("But your honor, once
>the knife left my hand it really wasn't under my control...")
What amazes me is that these legal arguments about the control programmers
have over their software, are coming from the free software community. If
Microsoft argued that anybody who wanted to write a program to link with
Windows system DLLs had to give them 2% of the profits, they'd be blasted by
the press, yet the free software community wants to argue that programmers
can't use their APIs if they don't have certain licensing terms?!
The irony is killing me.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST