Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Oct 29 2001 - 18:29:49 EST


On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:22:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does it make the accessed bit less reliable? Sure it does. But basically,
> either the page is accessed SO much that it stays in the TLB all the time
> (which is basically not really possible if you page heavily, I suspect),
> or it will age out of the TLB on its own at which point we get the
> accessed bit back.

Think of CPUs with tagged tlbs and lots of entries. Or even a system that
only runs 1 threaded app. Easily triggerable. If people want to optimise
it, great. But go for correctness first, please...

                -ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:38 EST