Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 13:31:48 EST

Next message: LLX: "Re: Module Licensing?"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: pre6 BUG oops"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:20:55AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> This seems kind of ugly - an array holding each device name? The patch
> I have rather puts a function to generate the device names when needed
> (which is probably not very often, unless GFS does something wierd).

*nod*

> I take it your patch is only the "bare bones" part which shows what is
> changed?

Well, it's a patch that tries to be not intrusive, it just crates the hooks
the two blockdevice drivers in the OpenGFS tree can use.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: LLX: "Re: Module Licensing?"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: pre6 BUG oops"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] init/main.c/root_dev_names - another one #ifdef"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:45 EST