> tux is more advanced than khttpd. It's also more intrusive to the kernel as
> far as core changes are concerned. These changes allow for higher
> performance, but you'll only notice that if you want to fill a gigabit line
> or more.....
Are there any good reasons why to run khttpd, then?
What I need is a server serving something between 50 and 500 concurrent
clients - each downloading at 4-8Mbps.
Which one would be best? Anyone have an idea?
thanks
roy
--- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST