Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 04:00:24 EST

Next message: Martin Eriksson: "Re: IDE is still crap.. or something"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 09:55:42PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I have to say that I like this patch better myself - the added tests are
> not sensible, and just removing them seems to be the right thing.

Linus,

Could we at least have a working -final kernel? Please?

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Eriksson: "Re: IDE is still crap.. or something"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:16 EST