Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?

From: Cameron Simpson (cs@zip.com.au)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 19:41:18 EST

Next message: David Weinehall: "Re: CML 1.9.0 is available"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "CML 1.9.0 is available"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:48:13AM -0200, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
| On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Jochen Striepe wrote:
| > I am *much* more irritated by:
| > $ uname -r
| > 2.4.15-greased-turkey
|
| Would you really have preferred 2.4.15-sitting-duck ?

Given what just happened with inode caches in 2.4.15, maybe more apt :-(

-- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@zip.com.au http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

Ride to not crash. Dress to crash. Live to ride to not crash again. - Lawrence Smith, DoD#i, lawrence@msc.cornell.edu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Weinehall: "Re: CML 1.9.0 is available"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "CML 1.9.0 is available"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:18 EST