Re: [RFC] 2.5/2.6/2.7 transition [was Re: Linux 2.4.16-pre1]

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 05:59:01 EST


On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> The _real_ solution is to make fewer fundamental changes between
> stable kernels, and that's a real solution that I expect to become
> more and more realistic as the kernel stabilizes.

Agreed, this would make a _lot_ of difference in the time it
takes to get a new stable kernel really stable.

> But you also have to realize that "fewer fundamental changes" is a
> mark of a system that isn't evolving as quickly, and that is reaching
> middle age. We are probably not quite there yet ;)

Doesn't mean we need to get _all_ our TODO items done in
2.5. I really don't see what's wrong with doing only a
few in 2.5 and delaying the rest for 2.7, especially not
when both 2.5 and 2.7 happen quickly ;)

regards,

Rik

-- 
Shortwave goes a long way:  irc.starchat.net  #swl

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:21 EST