Re: [RFC] 2.5/2.6/2.7 transition [was Re: Linux 2.4.16-pre1]

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 09:54:13 EST


=?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?= <wtarreau@yahoo.fr> said:

> Well, I know this has been discussed several times, but why not having 2
> stable trees : one for the average "joe" user which would include fixes
> and new features, and one for prod servers which will have only bugfixes,
> and quite old, tested features, with less risks of regression.

Think distributions, think 2.2.x (still actively maintained), think 2.4.x
(just now declared stable, ready for "just bugfixes"), and think 2.5.x +
assorted unofficial patches.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:21 EST