From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:29:19 -0800
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> Maybe you should give it a test to find out for sure :)
umm.. I've never seen any numbers from you, David.
I'll work on something for you this week then :-)
Not a problem.
ergo, there is no point in futzing with the pagecache_lock *at all*
until either TUX is merged, or we decide to support large-scale
NUMA hardware well
Or your "1a", "other sendfile applications", right?
I really still feel (and will try to show with numbers) that the copy
being present is not so important. Like I have stated on other
occaisions, several platforms do not harm L2 cache state during
copies, new lines are never brought in.
I expect x86 systems to move more in this direction if they aren't
somewhat there already.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:23 EST