At 8:28 PM +0100 11/26/01, Flavio Stanchina wrote:
>On Monday 26 November 2001 20:06, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
>> >Agreed. I stick with the -rc naming convention for 2.4+...
>> A quibble: "release" seems an odd word to choose for a Linux kernel.
>> Since we're calling the target kernel "final", how about -fc1,
>> -fc2...?
>
>Sounds a bit too much like the f-word.
>
>"rc" is the universally recognized name for such things (heck, even
>Microsoft) so I'd stick with it.
So in a choice between sex, love and Microsoft, we choose Microsoft?
I'm more used to -fc, myself; in fact I was unfamiliar with -rc. But
if Microsoft uses -rc, by all means, let's follow suit. ;-)
-- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:23 EST