Re: [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions

From: David C. Hansen (haveblue@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 14:53:46 EST

Next message: David Ford: "Re: 2.4.15 and GNU 3.0.2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: EINTR vs ERESTARTSYS, ERESTARTSYS not defined"
In reply to: Flavio Stanchina: "Re: [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Flavio Stanchina wrote:

>Look closer, it doesn't check 'handler' (it couldn't).
>
Silly me... Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "Re: 2.4.15 and GNU 3.0.2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: EINTR vs ERESTARTSYS, ERESTARTSYS not defined"
In reply to: Flavio Stanchina: "Re: [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:23 EST