On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:40:45AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:35:27 +0100
>
> Can you submit that version? ;)
>
> No, because it is writable by the user in every kernel source tree I
> have ever seen, the change makes no sense.
You haven't tried a BitKeeper tree then. You have to explicitly get
write permission.
> In the official tarballs it is writable, and even in every CVS tree
> (2.2.x, 2.4.x vger) I have looked at it is writable.
>
> And as Alan has stated, this code is pretty irrelevant soon.
If this rewrite goes into 2.4, yes. And using 2.2 as an example it
could after a while...
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:25 EST