Re: kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied

• Next message: Torrey Hoffman: "RE: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
• Previous message: Peter Bornemann: "Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7'"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The reason for that is because patch-2.5.1-pre1 is just basicly the inode
fix and some other things well and the version number change from 2.5.0 to
2.5.1-pre1.
The 2.5.0 is just the same as 2.4.15 except for the version numbers. And one
more thing 2.5.1-pre2 mite have already fixed something in main.c that it
can not go back and change for the kdb patch.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Torrey Hoffman: "RE: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
• Previous message: Peter Bornemann: "Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7'"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:29 EST