Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 21:32:17 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: heads-up: preempt kernel and tux NO-GO"
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oh yeah, I meant to ask: do we get 64-bit inode numbers and 64-bit block
numbers on x86 sometime in 2.5?

-- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: heads-up: preempt kernel and tux NO-GO"
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:29 EST