Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited

From: Oktay Akbal (oktay.akbal@s-tec.de)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 04:32:05 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Fix for sys_nanosleep() in 2.4.16"
Previous message: Suparna Bhattacharya: "bio write up - Updated notes on block layer design changes"
In reply to: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Next in thread: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Reply: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 29 Nov 2001, Nathan G. Grennan wrote:

> ok, I doubled checked things. It seems mounting an ext3 filesystem as
> ext2 is somewhat a myth. If the kernel supports ext3 it still mounts it
> as ext3 even if /etc/fstab says ext2.

really on other partitions than root-fs ?

-- Oktay Akbal

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Fix for sys_nanosleep() in 2.4.16"
Previous message: Suparna Bhattacharya: "bio write up - Updated notes on block layer design changes"
In reply to: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Next in thread: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Reply: Nathan G. Grennan: "Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:33 EST