Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices

From: Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels@cistron.nl)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 07:59:06 EST

Next message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Previous message: Borsenkow Andrej: "Re: kapm-idled no longer idling CPU?"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

According to Zwane Mwaikambo:
> It shows up as level-triggered.
>
> 22: 0 0 IO-APIC-level pentanet0 <==

OK. If it showed up as edge I would know what was wrong, but
level is correct.

Mike.

-- 
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
 and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Previous message: Borsenkow Andrej: "Re: kapm-idled no longer idling CPU?"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: XT-PIC vs IO-APIC and PCI devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:39 EST