Now are you sure this can't break anything ?
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> mark_inode_dirty() is quite expensive for journalling filesystems,
> and we're calling it a lot more than we need to.
>
> --- linux-2.4.17-pre1/fs/inode.c Mon Nov 26 11:52:07 2001
> +++ linux-akpm/fs/inode.c Thu Nov 29 21:53:02 2001
> @@ -1187,6 +1187,8 @@ void __init inode_init(unsigned long mem
>
> void update_atime (struct inode *inode)
> {
> + if (inode->i_atime == CURRENT_TIME)
> + return;
> if ( IS_NOATIME (inode) ) return;
> if ( IS_NODIRATIME (inode) && S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode) ) return;
> if ( IS_RDONLY (inode) ) return;
>
>
> with this patch, the time to read a 10 meg file with 10 million
> read()s falls from 38 seconds (ext3), 39 seconds (reiserfs) and
> 11.6 seconds (ext2) down to 10.5 seconds.
>
> -
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:39 EST