[OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium

From: Tom Vier (tmv5@home.com)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:19:07 EST

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "Linux HMT analysis"
Previous message: jamal: "Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!)"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:03:16PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> They do it also for putc() if you haven't defined the appropriate
> defines.

what exactly is the difference between putc() and fputc()? the man page is
very vague.

-- 
Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com>
DSA Key id 0x27371A2C
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "Linux HMT analysis"
Previous message: jamal: "Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!)"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:14 EST