On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Simon Turvey wrote:
>
> >Like I told you in the other forum. I have the solutions just my work is
> >being refused. Don't know if I have absolutely pissed off the
> >king-penguin or what but there is no reason to submit when I know it is
> >not going to be accepted
>
> Andre,
> Any chance of some further details on this work. AFAIKT you've been the
> foremost contributor of cutting-edge IDE updates for quite some time now. I
> find it astonishing that Linus would have inexplicably started refusing your
> code. At least point us in the right direction so we can try the new stuff
> out.
>
> Simon
I am working on a final update right now. This is after fixing the driver
to perform correct data-transport layers. This is linux soft-raid 0 w/
four drives. The are 4-20GB drives partitioned to make two md devices to
isolate peformance boundaries.
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
No size specified, using 510 MB
Size is MB, BlkSz is Bytes, Read, Write, and Seeks are MB/sec
File Block Num Seq Read Rand Read Seq Write Rand Write
Dir Size Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%)
------- ------ ------- --- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
. 510 4096 1 84.75 57.1% 1.081 1.17% 79.80 43.9% 4.285 2.46%
. 510 4096 2 78.88 52.8% 1.171 0.97% 73.64 48.8% 4.411 3.67%
. 510 4096 4 74.04 51.3% 1.402 1.16% 73.77 51.9% 4.391 3.65%
. 510 4096 8 67.93 47.9% 1.623 1.42% 71.43 52.1% 4.360 3.62%
File './Bonnie.943', size: 1073741824, volumes: 1
Writing with putc()... done: 9709 kB/s 98.9 %CPU
Rewriting... done: 49883 kB/s 41.4 %CPU
Writing intelligently...done: 99026 kB/s 50.0 %CPU
Reading with getc()... done: 9663 kB/s 99.1 %CPU
Reading intelligently...done: 89632 kB/s 55.0 %CPU
Seeker 1...Seeker 2...Seeker 3...start 'em...done...done...done...
---Sequential Output (nosync)--- ---Sequential Input-- --Rnd Seek-
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --04k (03)-
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
1*1024 9709 98.9 99026 50.0 49883 41.4 9663 99.1 89632 55.0 344.2 4.0
Wrote 38184 Meg / 78201343 blocks 0 Meg / 0 blocks
Device length: 40038825984 Bytes / 38184 Meg / 37 Gig
Total Diameter Sequential Pattern Write Test = 96.10 MB/Sec (397.35 Seconds)
Read 38183Meg (78198784 blocks)
Read failed on block number 78200832 at offset 40038825984 ( 0 / 512 )
Error: Input/output error
Could not find block: 78200833 for reading.
Error: Invalid argument
Read 38184Meg (78200833 blocks)
Device length: 40038825984 Bytes / 38184 Meg / 37 Gig
Total Diameter Sequential Pattern Read Test = 75.68 MB/Sec (504.53 Seconds)
Device passed! Seek OverRun!
The test has an overrun on the last request under lseek, working on fixing.
The slower read rate is a direct result of using a pattern buffer check
and comparison (write/read/verify/compare/contest-errors). Details later
but the drive(s) are faster than reported. These rates are using EXT2 for
the FS.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CEO/President, LAD Storage Consulting Group
Linux ATA Development
Linux Disk Certification Project
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:16 EST