Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)

From: Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 15:22:20 EST

Next message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up (fwd)"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: ACPI IRQ routing (was [ACPI] ACPI source release updated (200 11205))"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I think Becker once told me that there was no need to increase
the 1536 number (it is already plenty big, and has some extra space
in it already)...

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> To clarify, the patch takes PKT_BUF_SZ from (512*3) to (512*3)+4 which
> moves away from the nice multiple of a power-of-2 number.
>

-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up (fwd)"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: ACPI IRQ routing (was [ACPI] ACPI source release updated (200 11205))"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] MTU vlan-related patch for tulip (2.4.x)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST