On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 05:36, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:03:48PM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > But do you agree that the present code does NOT do this?
>
> Ok, thinking about this obfuscated code more, it would appear so. It
> would also appear that when the suspend request comes from the APM bios,
> the ioctl() method will not call send_event() at all - instead it comes
> from check_events().
Yes.
> However, as I said previously, this is a minor issue. I'd rather the
> major problem was fixed.
I agree entirely. I think that this change should be made.
The question is 'When?'. Is this too big a change to make
in 2.4?
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST