Re: [PATCH][OOPS] loop block device induced on 2.5.1-pre11+HIGHMEM

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 06:45:01 EST

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: the name "framebuffer""
Previous message: Jurij Smakov: "Re: PDC20265 IDE controller trouble"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH][OOPS] loop block device induced on 2.5.1-pre11+HIGHMEM"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH][OOPS] loop block device induced on 2.5.1-pre11+HIGHMEM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> Then again, is highmem kernel on non-highmem box a valid configuration?

Andrea had patches that allowed such a configuration. Better still,
it could be used for debugging highmem problems on boxes without highmem.

I thought this stuff had been merged, maybe it was only -aa, or -ac.

regards,
Dave.

-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: the name "framebuffer""
Previous message: Jurij Smakov: "Re: PDC20265 IDE controller trouble"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH][OOPS] loop block device induced on 2.5.1-pre11+HIGHMEM"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH][OOPS] loop block device induced on 2.5.1-pre11+HIGHMEM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:11 EST