Re: Is /dev/shm needed?

From: Adam Schrotenboer (adam@tabris.net)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 18:13:58 EST


On Sunday 16 December 2001 17:30, Robert Love wrote:
> In other words, if you have memory to spare and the data ought to be
> cached, Linux probably will cache it anyhow. On the other hand, if you
> have lots of memory to spare, give it a try. Mount /tmp or all of /var
> in tmpfs.

Unfortunately, some(many?) distros are b0rken in re /var/. There is stuff put
there that is needed across boots (for example, mandrake puts the DNS master
files in /var/named.)

>
> It is dynamic, so you don't need to specify a size. If you want to give
> a maximum size (probably a good idea), give one. Depends on what your
> tmp usages are and how much free memory you have.
>
> Robert Love

-- 
tabris

Sweet is love when all is sane Sweet is death to rid the pain Cruel is death when all is well Cruel is love when all is hell

Author unkown

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:12 EST