Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>
> Anyway, incremental patch is better, I'm going to submit my paches
> to 2.5 after some features (FR InARP, DCD handling, probably FR bridging)
> are added and tested.
>
> Seems it's better to include that things in 2.4 when it works fine.
> Especially if all drivers are updated.
> 2.5 first - of course.
How long do you think it will take to include the last changes in 2.4?
Isn't it possible to submit a patch without these new features, just to
speed up this process? Is there anything else that still need to be done
before you submit it?
It seems that there is a consensus that maintaining this out of the
kernel is causing some overhead to the drivers maintainers...
Best regards,
Daniela
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:13 EST