In article <20011217205547.C821@holomorphy.com> you wrote:
: On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:27:18PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
:> The most likely cause is simply waking up after each sound interrupt: you
:> also have a _lot_ of time handling interrupts. Quite frankly, web surfing
:> and mp3 playing simply shouldn't use any noticeable amounts of CPU.
: I think we have a winner:
: /proc/interrupts
: ------------------------------------------------
: CPU0
: 0: 17321824 XT-PIC timer
: 1: 4 XT-PIC keyboard
: 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
: 5: 46490271 XT-PIC soundblaster
: 9: 400232 XT-PIC usb-ohci, eth0, eth1
: 11: 939150 XT-PIC aic7xxx, aic7xxx
: 14: 13 XT-PIC ide0
: Approximately 4 times more often than the timer interrupt.
: That's not nice...
a bit offtopic, but the reason why there are so many interrupts is
that there's probably something like esd running. I've observed that idle
esd manages to generate tons of interrupts, although an strace of esd
reveals it stuck in a select(). probably one of the ioctls it issued
earlier is causing the driver to continuously read/write to the device.
the interrupts stop as soon as you kill esd.
: SoundBlaster 16
: A change of hardware should help verify this.
it happens even with cs4232 (redhat 7.2, 2.4.7-10smp), so I doubt it's
a soundblaster issue.
ganesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:15 EST