Re: APM driver patch summary

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 05:02:44 EST

Next message: TDSCAF: "Re: autofs4 problem"
Previous message: Jerome AUGE: "What about a "generic" ISA/BIOS PnP layer ?"
In reply to: Thomas Hood: "Re: APM driver patch summary"
Next in thread: Thomas Hood: "Re: APM driver patch summary"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:22:40PM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Finally, think carefully about where the cli() and sti() should go.

I believe the cli() and sti() to be correct - you shouldn't call
pm_send_all with IRQs off as it was previously. pm_send_all is a
function that can sleep (check the down(&pm_devs_lock) call).

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: TDSCAF: "Re: autofs4 problem"
Previous message: Jerome AUGE: "What about a "generic" ISA/BIOS PnP layer ?"
In reply to: Thomas Hood: "Re: APM driver patch summary"
Next in thread: Thomas Hood: "Re: APM driver patch summary"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:15 EST