Em Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:51:34PM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu:
> Which brings me to...
>
> Please let me know if this is something acceptable for 2.5.
>
> What kind of before/after effect do you see in lat_tcp/lat_connect
> (from lmbench) runs?
Improvements on the lat_connect case? :)
2.4.16
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 119.3369 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 118.9847 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 118.5139 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 119.1301 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 118.6322 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 429.6667 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 430.7692 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 431.4615 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 430.3846 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 435.4615 microseconds
2.4.16-acme5
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 119.2639 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 118.6068 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 119.0443 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 119.5683 microseconds
TCP latency using 127.0.0.1: 118.9556 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 408.3571 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 409.6429 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 410.6429 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 409.2143 microseconds
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 414.8333 microseconds
More results are coming, this time for local connections on a 8-way box
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST