On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:11:55PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:29:06PM +0300, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> > No doubts it still has broken misaligned access.
>
> You're way out of line with that comment.
>
> Not necessarily Russell. You have even told us on several occaisions
> that the older ARMs simply cannot fix up unaligned loads/stores in
> fact.
It read as "Oh, it's ARM, that's your problem then".
> Look, we're analyzing a problem and trying to explore every avenue
> for possible problems. If this were sparc64 I'd be checking my
> unaligned handler for bugs :-)
Well, as its already been established, its not running Linux, so it's not
my problem. 8)
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST