Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)

From: J Sloan (jjs@lexus.com)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 13:52:40 EST

Next message: Ben LaHaise: "aio"
Previous message: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
In reply to: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Next in thread: Josh McKinney: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: Josh McKinney: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"M. R. Brown" wrote:

> * nbecker@fred.net <nbecker@fred.net> on Wed, Dec 19, 2001:
>
> > Is it safe to use gcc-3.0.2 to compile the kernel?
>
> Absolutely not. There was at least one reported ICE (internal compiler
> error) with drivers/net/8139too.c. Stick to the 2.95.x series.

BTW 2.96 is fine also -

jjs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ben LaHaise: "aio"
Previous message: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
In reply to: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Next in thread: Josh McKinney: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: Josh McKinney: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST