On December 22, 2001 19:00, Dave Cinege wrote:
> Excellent! You've settled on using using an archiver format nobody uses,
Many file formats that require 'embedded' archives use cpio. RPM is one such
file format. I think every single RPM distribution relying on cpio for the
core of its package management system discounts your claim of 'nobody using
it'. Just because you have not seen cpio directly used as an archive format
doesn't mean it's unused.
> instead of the defacto standard that's already been implemented by
> atleast two people.
tar and cpio are both POSIX standards. I fail to see how one is more
'defacto' than the other.
As far as having tar already being implemented by at least two people, it
really doesn't matter for a format as simple as cpio. Having a reference
implementation for tar would be nice, as it is a hairy, complicated standard.
The cpio format can be fully described in less than a page.
> G-E-N-I-U-S!
Grow up. Please.
-Ryan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:28 EST