On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 20:04:24 -0800 (PST),
Chris Vandomelen <chrisv@b0rked.dhs.org> wrote:
>> No, that's not the case I'm talking about: what happens when a vendor
>> starts shipping this patch and Linus decides to add a new syscall that
>> uses a syscall number that the old kernel used for dynamic syscalls?
>
>If I understood correctly, /proc/dynamic_syscalls contains the information
>about dynamically registered syscall name->number associations, which are
>placed beyond the end of the currently registered set of syscalls. Later
>on down the line when we have 500 syscalls (exaggeration of course), the
>patch should still work as intended by just telling it that the empty
>slots in the syscall table begin at 501. So now your syscall that was
>registered as syscall 241 with the dynamic syscall patch in 2.4.17 now
>gets number 502 (or anything else for that matter) with the same patch
>under 5.4.23. Whee.
I'm glad somebody understands the code :).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:28 EST