> > 2. Isn't the boundary at 2^30 really irrelevant and the three "correct"
> > zones are (0 - 2^24-1), (2^24 - 2^32-1) and (2^32 - 2^36-1)?
>
> Nope. The limit for directly mapped memory is 2^30.
Ouch! That makes low memory *extremely* precious. Intuitively, the demand
for directly mapped memory will be proportional to the demand for all
memory, with a proportionality constant depending on the purpose for the
system and the efficiency of the application set. We've seen (apparently --
I haven't looked at any data, just messages on the list) cases where we can
force this to happen with benchmarks designed to embarrass the VM :)) but
have we seen it in real applications?
Thanks for taking the time to answer these questions. I'm struggling to
understand where the performance walls are in large i686 systems, in both
Linux and Windows. In the end, though, relentless application of Moore's Law
to the IA64 must be the correct answer :)).
-- M. Edward Boraskyznmeb@borasky-research.net http://www.borasky-research.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:15 EST