Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre6/drivers/block/loop.c compilation fixes

From: Adam J. Richter (adam@yggdrasil.com)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 00:15:08 EST

Next message: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1]"
Previous message: alad@hss.hns.com: "Re: locked page handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I made the following changes to compile
linux-2.5.2-pre6/drivers/block/loop.c. I do not have 2.5.2-pre6
running yet and do not expect to for a little while, so I don't
know how correct these changes are.

I removed two sanity checks that I think are absolutely
impossible cases, but I would appreciate some feedback on whether
I am misunderstanding something.

Because I have another patch applied to my loop.c, I am
sending a cvs diff against my previous version rather than
against pristine 2.5.2-pre6, but I think the patch should apply
anyhow.

Does anyone see any problems with this patch?

-- Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104 adam@yggdrasil.com \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034 +1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."

text/plain attachment: loop.diffs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1]"
Previous message: alad@hss.hns.com: "Re: locked page handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:16 EST