Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre9/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c blk_rq_map_sg simplification

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 08:25:39 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 6/7)"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre9/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c blk_rq_map_sg simplification"
In reply to: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre9/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c blk_rq_map_sg simplification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Adam J. Richter wrote:

> The conditional is one level deep (it's just a list of
> "and" conjunctions) and has a single conceptual meaning, "are
> the segments joinable?" For what it's worth, I really could not
> understand the old version until I rewrote it without gotos.

whitespace == a good thing.

-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 6/7)"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre9/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c blk_rq_map_sg simplification"
In reply to: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.2-pre9/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c blk_rq_map_sg simplification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:34 EST