Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:41:29 +0100
> Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > so I took the M.H.vL vmscan.c patch for 2.4.17 and it is a definite
> > winner for me. Sounds like 2.4.18 material.
>
> What issues have been solved or remarkably become better for you with Martins
> patch?
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
massive reduction of swapped out applications in the light of a 220+
MiB Cache. This on a 320 MiB System with about 2x swap. As a result,
interactive behaviour (this is a notebook) is much better. Before the
patch I had about 50-60 MB in swap for my workload (vmware + netscape +
plus kernel compile + updatedb). Now it is below 5 MB, although this is
still to much (yes, I know, I could turn off swap completely :-)
I also took the OOM-Killer patch, although it never was a real concern
for me.
Martin
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:35 EST