Hi,
Here is a 2.4.17 patch for doing PAGE_SIZE IO on raw devices. Instead
of doing 512 byte buffer heads, the patch does 4K buffer heads. This
patch significantly reduced CPU overhead and increased IO throughput
in our database benchmark runs. (CPU went from 45% busy to 6% busy).
Could you please consider this for 2.4.18 release ? If you need the
patch on 2.4.18-preX, I can make one quickly.
NOTES:
1) wait_kio() no longer uses "size" argument. But I have not removed
the arg, to minimize the diffs.
2) I do not like adding a new routine "submit_bh_blknr()" which is
one line change from submit_bh(). Is there a better solution ?
I have version of the patch which sets b_rsector to 0xffffffff
in brw_kiovec() and check for this in submit_bh(). But I don't
really like that hack.
Thanks,
Badari
diff -Nur -X dontdiff linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c linux-2417vary/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Mon Oct 29 12:11:17 2001
+++ linux-2417vary/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Wed Jan 9 15:47:05 2002
@@ -915,6 +915,38 @@
}
}
+/*
+ * submit_bh_blknr() - same as submit_bh() except that b_rsector is
+ * set to b_blocknr. Used for RAW VARY.
+ */
+void submit_bh_blknr(int rw, struct buffer_head * bh)
+{
+ int count = bh->b_size >> 9;
+
+ if (!test_bit(BH_Lock, &bh->b_state))
+ BUG();
+
+ set_bit(BH_Req, &bh->b_state);
+
+ /*
+ * First step, 'identity mapping' - RAID or LVM might
+ * further remap this.
+ */
+ bh->b_rdev = bh->b_dev;
+ bh->b_rsector = bh->b_blocknr;
+
+ generic_make_request(rw, bh);
+
+ switch (rw) {
+ case WRITE:
+ kstat.pgpgout += count;
+ break;
+ default:
+ kstat.pgpgin += count;
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* ll_rw_block: low-level access to block devices
* @rw: whether to %READ or %WRITE or maybe %READA (readahead)
diff -Nur -X dontdiff linux/drivers/char/raw.c linux-2417vary/drivers/char/raw.c
--- linux/drivers/char/raw.c Sat Sep 22 20:35:43 2001
+++ linux-2417vary/drivers/char/raw.c Wed Jan 9 16:05:37 2002
@@ -350,8 +350,12 @@
for (i=0; i < blocks; i++)
iobuf->blocks[i] = blocknr++;
+
+ iobuf->dovary = 1;
err = brw_kiovec(rw, 1, &iobuf, dev, iobuf->blocks, sector_size);
+
+ iobuf->dovary = 0;
if (rw == READ && err > 0)
mark_dirty_kiobuf(iobuf, err);
diff -Nur -X dontdiff linux/fs/buffer.c linux-2417vary/fs/buffer.c
--- linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Jan 9 15:52:19 2002
+++ linux-2417vary/fs/buffer.c Wed Jan 9 16:28:56 2002
@@ -2071,11 +2071,11 @@
err = 0;
for (i = nr; --i >= 0; ) {
- iosize += size;
tmp = bh[i];
if (buffer_locked(tmp)) {
wait_on_buffer(tmp);
}
+ iosize += tmp->b_size;
if (!buffer_uptodate(tmp)) {
/* We are traversing bh'es in reverse order so
@@ -2118,6 +2118,7 @@
struct kiobuf * iobuf = NULL;
struct page * map;
struct buffer_head *tmp, **bhs = NULL;
+ int iosize = size;
if (!nr)
return 0;
@@ -2154,7 +2155,7 @@
}
while (length > 0) {
- blocknr = b[bufind++];
+ blocknr = b[bufind];
if (blocknr == -1UL) {
if (rw == READ) {
/* there was an hole in the filesystem */
@@ -2167,9 +2168,15 @@
} else
BUG();
}
+ if (iobuf->dovary) {
+ iosize = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
+ if (iosize > length)
+ iosize = length;
+ }
+ bufind += (iosize/size);
tmp = bhs[bhind++];
- tmp->b_size = size;
+ tmp->b_size = iosize;
set_bh_page(tmp, map, offset);
tmp->b_this_page = tmp;
@@ -2185,7 +2192,10 @@
set_bit(BH_Uptodate, &tmp->b_state);
atomic_inc(&iobuf->io_count);
- submit_bh(rw, tmp);
+ if (iobuf->dovary)
+ submit_bh_blknr(rw, tmp);
+ else
+ submit_bh(rw, tmp);
/*
* Wait for IO if we have got too much
*/
@@ -2200,8 +2210,8 @@
}
skip_block:
- length -= size;
- offset += size;
+ length -= iosize;
+ offset += iosize;
if (offset >= PAGE_SIZE) {
offset = 0;
diff -Nur -X dontdiff linux/include/linux/iobuf.h linux-2417vary/include/linux/iobuf.h
--- linux/include/linux/iobuf.h Thu Nov 22 11:46:26 2001
+++ linux-2417vary/include/linux/iobuf.h Wed Jan 9 16:09:08 2002
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@
struct page ** maplist;
- unsigned int locked : 1; /* If set, pages has been locked */
+ unsigned int locked : 1, /* If set, pages has been locked */
+ dovary : 1; /* If set, do PAGE_SIZE length IO */
/* Always embed enough struct pages for atomic IO */
struct page * map_array[KIO_STATIC_PAGES];
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:28 EST