Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17

From: Mike Kravetz (kravetz@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 14:38:33 EST

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: system time issue"
Previous message: Pozsar Balazs: "[PATCH] 8139too: too early dev_kfree_skb"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Reply: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:24:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> (if you are about to run
> comparisons, i'd suggest the -G1 patch so you'll have all the recent
> fixes.)

I just kicked off another benchmark run to compare pre10, pre10 & G1
patch, pre10 & Davide's patch. chat and make will be run as before
with the addition of chat reniced. I won't attempt to make any claims
about interactive responsiveness. Simple throughput numbers. Results
should be available in about 24 hours.

-- 
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: system time issue"
Previous message: Pozsar Balazs: "[PATCH] 8139too: too early dev_kfree_skb"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Reply: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:28 EST