On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:28:39AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > Ben,
> > >
> > > By any chance do you have a list of drivers that assume this ?
> > > What does it take to fix them ?
> > >
> > > I think Jens BIO changes for 2.5 will fix this problem. But
> > > 2.4 needs a solution in this area too. This patch showed
> > > significant improvement for database workloads.
> >
> > I didn't checked the implementation but as far as the blkdev is
> > concerned the b_size changes without notification as soon as you 'mkfs
> > -b somethingelse' and then mount the fs. So it cannot break as far I can
> > tell. The only important thing is that b_size stays between 512 and 4k.
>
> The concern is/was differently sized buffer_heads in the same request,
> ie b_size changing as you iterate through the chunks of one request.
ok, I don't expect problems there. It can happen for example if you
create a snapshot with 4k and then you switch back the original volume
to 1k. the physical volume will get mixed b_size colaesced into the same
request.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:30 EST