Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17

From: Mike Kravetz (kravetz@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 12:40:34 EST

Next message: Frank Eichentopf: "New driver for D-Link DGE-500SX NIC"
Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > Higher is better.
>
> very interesting numbers, nice work Mike! I'd suggest the following
> additional test: please also run tests like VolanoMark with 'nice -n 19'.
> The O(1) scheduler's task-penalty method works in our favor in this case,
> since we know the test is CPU-bound we can move all processes to nice
> level 19.
>
> Ingo

I'll do that in the next go around. Right now, I'm trying to get some
TPC-H results.

-- 
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank Eichentopf: "New driver for D-Link DGE-500SX NIC"
Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:34 EST